elkaybie?
3/26/2009 12:27:47 AM
4/13/2009 6:12:14 PM
lets see who is an internet nerd....
4/13/2009 9:28:01 PM
^ don't pollute this site with attention whoring 16 year olds
4/13/2009 9:53:19 PM
^ don't attempt to speak for the rest of us
4/13/2009 9:54:06 PM
I didn't. I spoke for myself. Just because I didn't explicitly say, "I'd prefer you didn't pollute this site with stupid shit from the chans," doesn't mean that I wasn't stating a preference. In fact, unless someone speaks with a plural subject, "we," for instance, you should assume that an individual speaks solely for himself.
4/13/2009 9:59:05 PM
4/13/2009 10:00:14 PM
^^no, you spoke for the entire site. i.e., "don't pollute this site".[Edited on April 13, 2009 at 10:00 PM. Reason : a]
4/13/2009 10:00:19 PM
it's some attention whore with ugly eye makeup making the kissy lipsdime a dozen
4/13/2009 10:01:54 PM
oh come on... who doesn't love boxxy?
4/13/2009 10:02:18 PM
Although I appreciate this thread...its still not technically correct."Bangable" refers to a girl that isn't quite hot enough to date or actually go after, but she's just attractive enough, or has some great tits, or something else special about her that would make you fuck her.Most of these girls are much more than "bangable."
4/13/2009 10:03:19 PM
what would bangable mean other than you would bang them?
4/13/2009 10:05:16 PM
^
4/13/2009 10:06:05 PM
^^^I was using bangable in the "yes, I would do her right here, right now, no questions asked because OH MY GOD HOLY SHIT WOW"But your stance has already been expressed in the thread - you might have even already posted it [Edited on April 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM. Reason : fdg]
4/13/2009 10:06:21 PM
he might have evan already posted it, amirite
4/13/2009 10:12:51 PM
Kiwi that is not me
4/22/2009 9:34:20 AM