- Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism[Edited on October 14, 2026 at 11:10 PM. Reason : Critical thinking is possible only where the standpoints of all others are open to inspection. Hence, critical thinking, while still a solitary business, does not cut itself off from "all others." To be sure, it still goes on in isolation, but by the force of imagination it makes the others present and thus moves in a space that is potentially public, open to all sides; in other words, it adopts the position of Kant's world citizen. To think with an enlarged mentality means that one trains one's imagination to go visiting.]]
10/14/2026 11:10:49 PM
this shit isn’t that deep, manhe’s a piece of shit and there’s no amount of quotes you can post that will change that
10/14/2026 11:49:49 PM
10/14/2026 11:57:00 PM
10/15/2026 6:22:11 AM
Elon said the government set the speed limit, essentially the President.
10/15/2026 10:24:35 AM
10/15/2026 10:33:18 AM
So weird
10/15/2026 10:37:15 AM
[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:00 AM. Reason : LA TRAHISON DU JUIF DREYFUS. peut-être coupable, mais il pourrait être innocent]]
10/15/2026 10:59:03 AM
care to explain to the class why you felt the need to post that?
10/15/2026 4:38:23 PM
I could be wrong, but I think the point is that we’re all human and our judgments aren’t always perfect. You can criticize Elon Musk without assuming he’s completely beyond understanding or redemption. It seems like he’s suggesting that being too certain about someone’s character can prevent us from seeing the bigger picture.
10/15/2026 5:40:53 PM
Some people are 100% certain about everything, and it's really cool.
10/15/2026 6:16:42 PM
nobody here has ever claimed to be 100% certain about everything?I am 100% sure that Elon Musk is a piece of shit, though
10/15/2026 6:36:40 PM
ok i will elucidate since you askedYou brought up imagination on the last pageCael correctly pointed out
10/15/2026 7:47:39 PM
whatever you need to tell yourself to not see that Elon Musk is a piece of shit
10/15/2026 8:39:16 PM
that was not a post about elon musk, my dear child[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:43 PM. Reason : peut-être coupable, mais il pourrait être innocent]
10/15/2026 8:42:28 PM
this is a thread about Elon Musk and a discussion about him being a piece of shit feel free to disagree and explain why you don’t think he’s a piece of shit
10/15/2026 8:44:25 PM
my opinion on Elon Musk is irrelevant[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:48 PM. Reason : pay more attention to jaures' opinion on Courage]
10/15/2026 8:47:38 PM
I disagreethere are sides to take [Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:53 PM. Reason : .]
10/15/2026 8:52:48 PM
the nonparticipants, called irresponsible by the majority, were the only ones who dared judge by themselves
10/15/2026 9:02:42 PM
Idk how irrelevant someone can be with like spending 250 mil for 2026 midterms
10/15/2026 9:23:02 PM
This is the thread where we discuss how credible, or uncredible he is, based on things he does and says, and our resulting opinions of him. Also is it so hard to separate the art from the artist? He can't be a piece of shit just because he made positive contributions to technology?
10/15/2026 9:59:56 PM
I’m skeptical this is really about encouraging independent thought when you won’t even share your own opinion on Elon. It feels more like an elaborate intellectual exercise to avoid taking an actual position.
10/15/2026 10:19:03 PM
I was trying to decide to post this dumb meme i made but the super defensive post in the other thread made me take the jumpSttexan is a wildcard, im just a dummy off to the side that everybody hates together[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:35 PM. Reason : Tell me I'm funny and nice and worth validation pls][Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:37 PM. Reason : Damnit I meant to say TSB instead of TWW damnit]
10/15/2026 10:33:18 PM
gonna need you to explain why you think I deserve that. the other end of that one is very deserved.I honestly feel that me and you post very similarly [Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:42 PM. Reason : .]
10/15/2026 10:41:08 PM
You could say I'm bipolar[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM. Reason : ^seriously. I'd say tgl, moron, and rwoody are all pretty much on the same page]
10/15/2026 10:46:41 PM
^^Maybe! I'm a terrible judge of my own posts!I think we have very similar policitics but I think your posting style is far more combative and absolute than mine, imho[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM. Reason : E]
10/15/2026 10:46:48 PM
Thats fair too imo. I edited mine aboveI'd say bullet, and a few others also very similar
10/15/2026 10:48:31 PM
Politics or post style?
10/15/2026 10:49:04 PM
Politics for sure[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:51 PM. Reason : The more liberal wing if you will]
10/15/2026 10:50:07 PM
just sick of the people who trip over themselves to find a way to be ok with anything that’s currently going on. my wife is a federal employee and this is a place to vent. I’m also just tired of people not speaking with their chest. I’m happy to be an absolutist when it comes to anything regarding human rights
10/15/2026 10:51:31 PM
*sigh*
qntmfred's view of Elon MuskA central theme emerges from qntmfred's posts: he admires Musk's technological accomplishments and sees value in some of his ambitions, but does not regard him as above criticism. He strongly objects to what he considers exaggerated, unfair, or ideologically motivated condemnations of Musk's character.The distinction is particularly explicit in a January 20, 2025 post:there's plenty of legitimate things to criticize elon for. and I have, on many occasions. but hallucinating nonsense to try to smear him about is stupid on your part, and also makes it harder to shine a light on the legitimate stuff.He also says:my only allegiance is to truth and reasonableness.That statement is a useful summary of how he presents his position, although it's a declaration of his intended approach rather than proof that his conclusions are always correct. He genuinely admires Musk's technological accomplishmentsIn September 2023, qntmfred reported reading Musk's biography and said it helped put his good and bad behavior into perspective.In October 2024, following SpaceX's successful rocket-booster catch, he argued that Musk deserved credit for his contribution, even though thousands of engineers participated. He also suggested that the tendency of some critics to minimize Musk's accomplishments may have contributed to his increasingly antagonistic political behavior. He regards Musk as more than a wealthy investor or public-relations figure. His contributions to ambitious technological enterprises, particularly space exploration, merit recognition independently of his other conduct.He disputes the characterization of Musk as a Nazi or white supremacistThis is probably the most persistent disagreement in the thread.From December 2024 through January 2026, qntmfred repeatedly challenged the claim that Musk's statements, associations, and political behavior establish that he believes in white supremacy.His interpretation is that Musk's underlying worldview is primarily about technological progress, Western Enlightenment values, merit, and the future of civilization—not racial hierarchy.He points to Musk's defense of H-1B immigration, stated opposition to racism, and interest in global birth rates as evidence supporting that interpretation. He also acknowledges evidence that complicates it. His position is not that Musk's conduct is consistently acceptable. For example, he criticizes Musk for repeatedly engaging with racist figures and failing to challenge unacceptable behavior among his allies.By January 2026, he explicitly condemns Musk for amplifying an account promoting white racial solidarity, characterizing it as fearful, conspiratorial behavior.His memorable conclusion:Elon is a Loser.Followed immediately by an acknowledgment that Musk remains accomplished at rockets. He is critical of Musk's politics, but also of the opposition's responseHis position on DOGE in February 2025 is revealing.He acknowledges a need to modernize government, reduce waste, and address unsustainable spending. He also expresses some hope that disruptive reforms could improve government in the long term.But he explicitly criticizes DOGE's execution as partly an ideological purge, agrees that it squandered an opportunity to modernize government effectively, and states that he isn't pleased with what is happening.His criticism of Democrats is that they failed to address recognizable problems before Trump returned to office, allowing an administration he did not trust to attempt those reforms instead. There are other specific negative assessments throughout the thread. He deducts credibility when X blocks links to Signal, calls Musk's allegation about Democrats deliberately encouraging illegal immigration for votes stupid and mistaken, and questions whether Musk's Grokipedia can become trustworthy. He is more interested in understanding motives than assigning permanent moral identitiesThis becomes the dominant theme of his later posts.He repeatedly argues that understanding why Musk supports a particular political movement does not require endorsing that movement.For example, he interprets Musk's support for Germany's AfD partly through frustrations over immigration and what he sees as mainstream parties' failure to address those frustrations seriously. He separately expresses support for immigration as both a moral and economic good and disagrees with Musk's narrower immigration preferences. He similarly argues that we should examine Musk's complete record rather than select the statements that produce either the most flattering or the most damning interpretation.This is the philosophical position underlying his recent references to Arendt, Kant, the Dreyfus Affair, and Jean Jaurès.In his October 15, 2026 post, he explicitly connects independent judgment with imagination, humility, morality, and courage. His larger concern is the danger of allowing ideological identification and collective hostility to replace individual reasoning. How his position is perceived versus what he actually saysThere's an important tension.Other participants repeatedly perceive qntmfred's interventions as defending Musk because he spends considerable time challenging their negative interpretations.And it's fair to observe that he frequently extends Musk the benefit of the doubt regarding his motivations, particularly when evaluating allegations of racism or ideological extremism.He even acknowledges this possibility in February 2025, saying he might grant Musk more benefit of the doubt than Musk deserves. Critics, meanwhile, argue that Musk's repeated statements, associations, and actions provide stronger evidence of his underlying attitudes than his explicit declarations of good intentions.That is a substantive disagreement over how to weigh evidence, not merely an inability by one side to comprehend the other's argument.The clearest statement of his own positionOn January 8, 2026, qntmfred explicitly rejected the characterization of himself as a Musk devotee:I'm NOT an elon stan.He then acknowledged that Musk had done both great and terrible things and explained that his participation in the thread was motivated less by loyalty to Musk than by frustration with how his longtime friends were interpreting political events. My synthesis: qntmfred sees Elon Musk as an accomplished, ambitious technological builder whose political conduct, rhetoric, and associations include serious mistakes and objectionable behavior. He nevertheless believes that critics frequently exaggerate or mischaracterize Musk's motives and moral identity, undermining legitimate criticism in the process.The most important distinction is that his defense of Musk against particular accusations is not intended as a defense of Musk's entire character. His overarching concern is how people evaluate evidence, attribute motives, and form moral judgments—especially when they already strongly dislike the person being judged.That interpretation is supported by the evolution of his posts from 2022 through October 2026, rather than just the latest exchange.
10/15/2026 10:56:02 PM
^^I understand the anger, and the politics, but if you're on TSB in an attempt to convince anyone you're right, I think your methods need work. I don't think I'm in the first 10 people to direct this feedback your way.Note: I don't think I'm convincing anyone either but more bc I'm just bad at persuasive writing (or writing in general). Im sure I have pure anger posts, like when cael was gloating Nov 24, but I think my posts in general have way less condescension and venom[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:01 PM. Reason : E]
10/15/2026 10:57:28 PM
I’m not here to attempt to convince anyone of anything if I wasn’t sure that I was right about something, I wouldn’t post about it. it really is as simple as that. (to be clear, this is only about posting in TSB)
10/15/2026 11:00:58 PM
Main Points of qntmfred’s Views on Elon Musk* Admires Musk’s accomplishments: Believes Musk deserves recognition for his contributions to technology, particularly SpaceX and space exploration.* Rejects blind loyalty: Insists he isn’t an Elon Musk fanboy and acknowledges Musk has done both great and terrible things.* Disputes accusations of racism: Believes Musk’s worldview centers more on technological progress and Western values than racial supremacy.* Acknowledges problematic behavior: Criticizes Musk’s associations with racist figures, inflammatory rhetoric, and questionable political decisions.* Mixed feelings about DOGE: Supports government efficiency but criticizes DOGE’s execution and ideological motivations.* Criticizes Musk’s opponents: Believes critics frequently exaggerate accusations, misinterpret motivations, and undermine legitimate criticism.* Emphasizes independent thinking: Advocates evaluating evidence objectively rather than adopting judgments based on political affiliations.* Extends Musk the benefit of the doubt: Often interprets Musk’s intentions favorably, sometimes acknowledging he may be too generous.* Separates accomplishments from character: Believes technological achievements deserve recognition regardless of personal shortcomings.* Central philosophy: Understanding someone’s motivations doesn’t mean endorsing their behavior.Overall: qntmfred sees Musk as a deeply flawed but accomplished individual and believes ideological hostility frequently prevents people from evaluating him fairly.
10/15/2026 11:01:17 PM
10/15/2026 11:02:11 PM
^^^I don't understand posting on a political forum if not to discuss and debate politics, but ok I don't need to understand we're all differentI guess to end on a compliment, I'm jealous of your confidence
10/15/2026 11:04:26 PM
10/15/2026 11:04:52 PM
Sure, again, fair enough. I don't get spending so much time telling others they are wrong if you aren't trying to convince them that they are wrong, but fine.[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:07 PM. Reason : E]My response when I read something wrong but have no desire to correct/convince them: "........"[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:08 PM. Reason : A]^I'm jealous of lots of things for you! You're obviously smart and super well read! [Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:10 PM. Reason : Compliments for everyone ]
10/15/2026 11:07:37 PM
in 2026, on a large/national scale, I don’t see anything worth debating intra-party debates are different. I’m nearly certain that we’re on the same page when it comes to that. that’s way different than posting about the awfulness of the right on a regular basis. there is nothing up for debate when it comes to them.
10/15/2026 11:10:12 PM
if anything i'm trying to convince others that their methods of evaluating reality are tainted. it's not about i'm right. it's that people are 100% convinced that the jew is a traitor
10/15/2026 11:10:38 PM
10/15/2026 11:14:01 PM
^^but, like, to want to convince you have to think they are wrong, and the end goal is to get them to look at reality "correct" and then they will agree with you bc you are objectively correct? I may be way off base but that sentence is the core of most of your posts by my interpretation.[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:16 PM. Reason : Yea i don't get why everything comes back to antisemitism, the boogie man in every closet ]The whole point of the horseshoe is that opposing views end up having similarities, in this case: rwoody reading condescension [Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:18 PM. Reason : I wouldn't expect you to be a fan, it criticizes you ]
10/15/2026 11:14:45 PM
to sum up my posts in TSB the most surface level possible: obviously bad things are badit is legitimately as simple as that. I don’t see how that’s in the same universe as whatever is going on with the other dude.
10/15/2026 11:21:01 PM
10/15/2026 11:26:21 PM
^ok^^okI relent we can go back to arguing making statements that have no underlying intent to change minds about Elon
10/15/2026 11:28:46 PM
agreedwhat'd y'all think of his neato flying car tonight. pretty neato right?[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:30 PM. Reason : i like things that are neato]
10/15/2026 11:30:41 PM
dude sucks shitI do not care to see a wall of text that has absolutely nothing to do with dude sucking shit
10/15/2026 11:32:10 PM
10/15/2026 11:34:11 PM
10/15/2026 11:36:46 PM