User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Elon Musk Credibility Watch Page 1 ... 23 24 25 26 [27], Prev  
qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post


- Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

[Edited on October 14, 2026 at 11:10 PM. Reason : Critical thinking is possible only where the standpoints of all others are open to inspection. Hence, critical thinking, while still a solitary business, does not cut itself off from "all others." To be sure, it still goes on in isolation, but by the force of imagination it makes the others present and thus moves in a space that is potentially public, open to all sides; in other words, it adopts the position of Kant's world citizen. To think with an enlarged mentality means that one trains one's imagination to go visiting.]

10/14/2026 11:10:49 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

this shit isn’t that deep, man

he’s a piece of shit and there’s no amount of quotes you can post that will change that

10/14/2026 11:49:49 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"we're only human"

10/14/2026 11:57:00 PM

dmspack
oh we back
27497 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Elon seems like a piece of shit"


[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 6:22 AM. Reason : E]

10/15/2026 6:22:11 AM

The Coz
Tempus Fugitive
31759 Posts
user info
edit post

Elon said the government set the speed limit, essentially the President.

10/15/2026 10:24:35 AM

CaelNCSU
All American
8296 Posts
user info
edit post

10/15/2026 10:33:18 AM

Bullet
All American
29895 Posts
user info
edit post

So weird

10/15/2026 10:37:15 AM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post



[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:00 AM. Reason : LA TRAHISON DU JUIF DREYFUS. peut-être coupable, mais il pourrait être innocent]

10/15/2026 10:59:03 AM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

care to explain to the class why you felt the need to post that?

10/15/2026 4:38:23 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

I could be wrong, but I think the point is that we’re all human and our judgments aren’t always perfect. You can criticize Elon Musk without assuming he’s completely beyond understanding or redemption. It seems like he’s suggesting that being too certain about someone’s character can prevent us from seeing the bigger picture.

10/15/2026 5:40:53 PM

The Coz
Tempus Fugitive
31759 Posts
user info
edit post

Some people are 100% certain about everything, and it's really cool.

10/15/2026 6:16:42 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

nobody here has ever claimed to be 100% certain about everything?

I am 100% sure that Elon Musk is a piece of shit, though

10/15/2026 6:36:40 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

ok i will elucidate since you asked

You brought up imagination on the last page

Cael correctly pointed out

Quote :
"I at least have enough imagination I don't say dumb shit like, I can't understand how people vote Kamala. I totally get the hate and also understand why people like Elon."


there's a couple things I see going on here

Imagination. Imagination is a form of Thinking. It is the ability to conceive in your mind of how another person might arrive at a different point of view.

Humility. Humility is a form of Thinking. It is the ability to recognize that your understanding and interpretation of another person's beliefs, motives, character or behavior might be incomplete or incorrect.

Morality. Morality is a form of Thinking. It is the ability to choose to treat others as you would like to be treated. Would you like to misunderstood or misinterpreted and as a result be called evil by another person?

Courage. Courage is a form of Thinking. It is the ability to decide what you think. It is the ability to not let other people decide what you think for you. It is the ability to realize the circumstances in which you should change what you think and to follow through, despite potential consequences.

So why did I bring up Jean Jaures?

for one, bc he's a socialist. brilliant. influential. historic. whatever revolutionary, rebellious coolkid street cred I now apparently lack in my middle age, be assured he still had it. and died for it. so maybe you'll consider what he had to say since i've been written off

more importantly, because he had the wisdom and courage to change his mind about important, controversial, contentious topics when it became clear to him that he had been wrong. And to do so publicly as the leader of his movement.

about what? about the Traitor Jew Alfred Dreyfus.

accusing people of being a traitor is relevant
accusing jews of crimes they did not commit is relevant
getting swept away in unthinking mob behavior to do such things is relevant

And why did I bring up Hannah Arendt?

Arendt is probably best known for her book I quoted, The Origins of Totalitarianism. most of her work was studying how people relinquish their capacity for independent, critical thought, often without realizing they've done so, and the path from this behavior to Totalitarianism. especially in the context of the extermination of Jews during the Holocaust. you wouldn't want to inadvertendly do anything that creates more Totalitarianism in the world, would you? perhaps then it would be wise to more closely study its Origins.

It's convenient the section I quoted spoke to Imagination's relationship to Totalitarianism in the context of the Dreyfus Affair. it's also conventient the other section I quoted that speaks to Imagination's (the "enlarged mentality") relationship to Critical Thinking is from Arendt's lecture notes on Kant's Critique of Judgment, which is the bridge between Understanding via Reason and Moral Action.

p.s. you can draw a straight line from how people Understood, Reasoned and Acted during and after the Dreyfus Affair to Trump being president in 2024. you wouldn't want to inadvertendly do anything that creates more Trump being president in the world, would you? perhaps then it would be wise to more closely study how people Understood, Reasoned and Acted during and after the Dreyfus Affair.

So why this particular Jean Jaures speech?

It's a speech to the children of the French nation. This is especially relevant for me because I too have children and a nation, and all of my ponderings and reactions to what i see in the world today are primarily motivated because i worry about the world that awaits both of them. and especially the degree to which the world tells them to relinquish their capacity for independent, critical thought. and I hope that they will be inspired by people in their lives to remember their Imagination, Humility, Morality and Courage and escape the curse of passing on our Human, Unthinking, Totalitarian tendencies to the next generation of children and nations.

So what does this particular Jean Jaures speech say?

It's about Courage. What are some things he says about Courage that made me feel the need to post it?

Courage is celebrating humanity not denying it.
Courage is not handing over your free will to random forces or impressions.
Courage is understanding your own life, establishing, sharpening and deepening it while also coordinating it with the wider society.
Courage is acknowledging new developments in science and art, welcoming and exploring the almost infinite complexity of knowledge while clarifying the bewildering reality with a broad general understanding and organising and shaping it with the beauty of form and pattern.
Courage is overcoming your faults, suffering for them but not being overwhelmed or side-tracked by them.
Courage is loving life and looking death in the eye, about aiming for the ideal and understanding the real.
Courage is seeking truth and speaking truth, not submitting to a great triumphant lie or echoing ignorant applause or fanatical jeers with our hearts, our mouths or our hands.

So, young tdubbers, you want your lives to be lived, honest and full. And that is why I have shared what I have with you in the way that I have.


[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 7:50 PM. Reason : I ain't reading all that, Free Palestine, amirite]

10/15/2026 7:47:39 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

whatever you need to tell yourself to not see that Elon Musk is a piece of shit

10/15/2026 8:39:16 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

that was not a post about elon musk, my dear child

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:43 PM. Reason : peut-être coupable, mais il pourrait être innocent]

10/15/2026 8:42:28 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

this is a thread about Elon Musk and a discussion about him being a piece of shit

feel free to disagree and explain why you don’t think he’s a piece of shit

10/15/2026 8:44:25 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

my opinion on Elon Musk is irrelevant

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:48 PM. Reason : pay more attention to jaures' opinion on Courage]

10/15/2026 8:47:38 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

I disagree

there are sides to take

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 8:53 PM. Reason : .]

10/15/2026 8:52:48 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

the nonparticipants, called irresponsible by the majority, were the only ones who dared judge by themselves

10/15/2026 9:02:42 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

Idk how irrelevant someone can be with like spending 250 mil for 2026 midterms

10/15/2026 9:23:02 PM

TreeTwista10
RemLezarkSpain
151839 Posts
user info
edit post

This is the thread where we discuss how credible, or uncredible he is, based on things he does and says, and our resulting opinions of him. Also is it so hard to separate the art from the artist? He can't be a piece of shit just because he made positive contributions to technology?

10/15/2026 9:59:56 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

I’m skeptical this is really about encouraging independent thought when you won’t even share your own opinion on Elon. It feels more like an elaborate intellectual exercise to avoid taking an actual position.

10/15/2026 10:19:03 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

I was trying to decide to post this dumb meme i made but the super defensive post in the other thread made me take the jump



Sttexan is a wildcard, im just a dummy off to the side that everybody hates together

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:35 PM. Reason : Tell me I'm funny and nice and worth validation pls]

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:37 PM. Reason : Damnit I meant to say TSB instead of TWW damnit]

10/15/2026 10:33:18 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

gonna need you to explain why you think I deserve that. the other end of that one is very deserved.

I honestly feel that me and you post very similarly

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:42 PM. Reason : .]

10/15/2026 10:41:08 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

You could say I'm bipolar

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM. Reason : ^seriously. I'd say tgl, moron, and rwoody are all pretty much on the same page]

10/15/2026 10:46:41 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

^^Maybe! I'm a terrible judge of my own posts!

I think we have very similar policitics but I think your posting style is far more combative and absolute than mine, imho

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM. Reason : E]

10/15/2026 10:46:48 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

Thats fair too imo. I edited mine above

I'd say bullet, and a few others also very similar

10/15/2026 10:48:31 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

Politics or post style?

10/15/2026 10:49:04 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

Politics for sure

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 10:51 PM. Reason : The more liberal wing if you will]

10/15/2026 10:50:07 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

just sick of the people who trip over themselves to find a way to be ok with anything that’s currently going on. my wife is a federal employee and this is a place to vent. I’m also just tired of people not speaking with their chest.

I’m happy to be an absolutist when it comes to anything regarding human rights

10/15/2026 10:51:31 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

*sigh*

Quote :
"i've already explained my theories on elon and why i think you've got it wrong. ask clawai to explain it ig"



fine i had chatpgt read the thread. click HERE to find out qfred's opinion according to the mathball

qntmfred's view of Elon Musk
A central theme emerges from qntmfred's posts: he admires Musk's technological accomplishments and sees value in some of his ambitions, but does not regard him as above criticism. He strongly objects to what he considers exaggerated, unfair, or ideologically motivated condemnations of Musk's character.
The distinction is particularly explicit in a January 20, 2025 post:
there's plenty of legitimate things to criticize elon for. and I have, on many occasions. but hallucinating nonsense to try to smear him about is stupid on your part, and also makes it harder to shine a light on the legitimate stuff.

He also says:
my only allegiance is to truth and reasonableness.

That statement is a useful summary of how he presents his position, although it's a declaration of his intended approach rather than proof that his conclusions are always correct.

He genuinely admires Musk's technological accomplishments
In September 2023, qntmfred reported reading Musk's biography and said it helped put his good and bad behavior into perspective.
In October 2024, following SpaceX's successful rocket-booster catch, he argued that Musk deserved credit for his contribution, even though thousands of engineers participated. He also suggested that the tendency of some critics to minimize Musk's accomplishments may have contributed to his increasingly antagonistic political behavior.

He regards Musk as more than a wealthy investor or public-relations figure. His contributions to ambitious technological enterprises, particularly space exploration, merit recognition independently of his other conduct.
He disputes the characterization of Musk as a Nazi or white supremacist
This is probably the most persistent disagreement in the thread.
From December 2024 through January 2026, qntmfred repeatedly challenged the claim that Musk's statements, associations, and political behavior establish that he believes in white supremacy.
His interpretation is that Musk's underlying worldview is primarily about technological progress, Western Enlightenment values, merit, and the future of civilization—not racial hierarchy.
He points to Musk's defense of H-1B immigration, stated opposition to racism, and interest in global birth rates as evidence supporting that interpretation. He also acknowledges evidence that complicates it.

His position is not that Musk's conduct is consistently acceptable. For example, he criticizes Musk for repeatedly engaging with racist figures and failing to challenge unacceptable behavior among his allies.
By January 2026, he explicitly condemns Musk for amplifying an account promoting white racial solidarity, characterizing it as fearful, conspiratorial behavior.
His memorable conclusion:
Elon is a Loser.

Followed immediately by an acknowledgment that Musk remains accomplished at rockets.

He is critical of Musk's politics, but also of the opposition's response
His position on DOGE in February 2025 is revealing.
He acknowledges a need to modernize government, reduce waste, and address unsustainable spending. He also expresses some hope that disruptive reforms could improve government in the long term.
But he explicitly criticizes DOGE's execution as partly an ideological purge, agrees that it squandered an opportunity to modernize government effectively, and states that he isn't pleased with what is happening.
His criticism of Democrats is that they failed to address recognizable problems before Trump returned to office, allowing an administration he did not trust to attempt those reforms instead.

There are other specific negative assessments throughout the thread. He deducts credibility when X blocks links to Signal, calls Musk's allegation about Democrats deliberately encouraging illegal immigration for votes stupid and mistaken, and questions whether Musk's Grokipedia can become trustworthy.

He is more interested in understanding motives than assigning permanent moral identities
This becomes the dominant theme of his later posts.
He repeatedly argues that understanding why Musk supports a particular political movement does not require endorsing that movement.
For example, he interprets Musk's support for Germany's AfD partly through frustrations over immigration and what he sees as mainstream parties' failure to address those frustrations seriously. He separately expresses support for immigration as both a moral and economic good and disagrees with Musk's narrower immigration preferences.

He similarly argues that we should examine Musk's complete record rather than select the statements that produce either the most flattering or the most damning interpretation.
This is the philosophical position underlying his recent references to Arendt, Kant, the Dreyfus Affair, and Jean Jaurès.
In his October 15, 2026 post, he explicitly connects independent judgment with imagination, humility, morality, and courage. His larger concern is the danger of allowing ideological identification and collective hostility to replace individual reasoning.

How his position is perceived versus what he actually says
There's an important tension.
Other participants repeatedly perceive qntmfred's interventions as defending Musk because he spends considerable time challenging their negative interpretations.
And it's fair to observe that he frequently extends Musk the benefit of the doubt regarding his motivations, particularly when evaluating allegations of racism or ideological extremism.
He even acknowledges this possibility in February 2025, saying he might grant Musk more benefit of the doubt than Musk deserves.

Critics, meanwhile, argue that Musk's repeated statements, associations, and actions provide stronger evidence of his underlying attitudes than his explicit declarations of good intentions.
That is a substantive disagreement over how to weigh evidence, not merely an inability by one side to comprehend the other's argument.
The clearest statement of his own position
On January 8, 2026, qntmfred explicitly rejected the characterization of himself as a Musk devotee:
I'm NOT an elon stan.

He then acknowledged that Musk had done both great and terrible things and explained that his participation in the thread was motivated less by loyalty to Musk than by frustration with how his longtime friends were interpreting political events.

My synthesis: qntmfred sees Elon Musk as an accomplished, ambitious technological builder whose political conduct, rhetoric, and associations include serious mistakes and objectionable behavior. He nevertheless believes that critics frequently exaggerate or mischaracterize Musk's motives and moral identity, undermining legitimate criticism in the process.
The most important distinction is that his defense of Musk against particular accusations is not intended as a defense of Musk's entire character. His overarching concern is how people evaluate evidence, attribute motives, and form moral judgments—especially when they already strongly dislike the person being judged.
That interpretation is supported by the evolution of his posts from 2022 through October 2026, rather than just the latest exchange.


10/15/2026 10:56:02 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

^^I understand the anger, and the politics, but if you're on TSB in an attempt to convince anyone you're right, I think your methods need work. I don't think I'm in the first 10 people to direct this feedback your way.

Note: I don't think I'm convincing anyone either but more bc I'm just bad at persuasive writing (or writing in general). Im sure I have pure anger posts, like when cael was gloating Nov 24, but I think my posts in general have way less condescension and venom

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:01 PM. Reason : E]

10/15/2026 10:57:28 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

I’m not here to attempt to convince anyone of anything

if I wasn’t sure that I was right about something, I wouldn’t post about it. it really is as simple as that.

(to be clear, this is only about posting in TSB)

10/15/2026 11:00:58 PM

StTexan
Not AI!
17958 Posts
user info
edit post

Main Points of qntmfred’s Views on Elon Musk

* Admires Musk’s accomplishments: Believes Musk deserves recognition for his contributions to technology, particularly SpaceX and space exploration.
* Rejects blind loyalty: Insists he isn’t an Elon Musk fanboy and acknowledges Musk has done both great and terrible things.
* Disputes accusations of racism: Believes Musk’s worldview centers more on technological progress and Western values than racial supremacy.
* Acknowledges problematic behavior: Criticizes Musk’s associations with racist figures, inflammatory rhetoric, and questionable political decisions.
* Mixed feelings about DOGE: Supports government efficiency but criticizes DOGE’s execution and ideological motivations.
* Criticizes Musk’s opponents: Believes critics frequently exaggerate accusations, misinterpret motivations, and undermine legitimate criticism.
* Emphasizes independent thinking: Advocates evaluating evidence objectively rather than adopting judgments based on political affiliations.
* Extends Musk the benefit of the doubt: Often interprets Musk’s intentions favorably, sometimes acknowledging he may be too generous.
* Separates accomplishments from character: Believes technological achievements deserve recognition regardless of personal shortcomings.
* Central philosophy: Understanding someone’s motivations doesn’t mean endorsing their behavior.

Overall: qntmfred sees Musk as a deeply flawed but accomplished individual and believes ideological hostility frequently prevents people from evaluating him fairly.

10/15/2026 11:01:17 PM

TreeTwista10
RemLezarkSpain
151839 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"
Ken Warner
@kenwarner
I appreciate many things about Elon, but his repeated inability to treat others with basic decency and respect has been quite the turnoff."


See, this seems like something most people on here would agree with. But I wouldn't have seen it had I not clicked on a bunch of twitter links, which I don't necessarily come to TWW to do.

10/15/2026 11:02:11 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^I don't understand posting on a political forum if not to discuss and debate politics, but ok I don't need to understand we're all different

I guess to end on a compliment, I'm jealous of your confidence

10/15/2026 11:04:26 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" you're on TSB in an attempt to convince anyone you're right, I think your methods need work. I don't think I'm in the first 10 people to direct this feedback your way"


I'm not even trying to convince anybody that I'M right. The last few years I've spent a gazillion hours just learning, trying to fill in the multiple infinities of my own ignorance rather that going around telling people what I believe because I'm far more interested in convincing myself that i'm right. I share what I learn from in hopes that other people like to learn too, but that's clearly not happening here. no worries. my methods do need work and my methods have already started changing. just not here.

10/15/2026 11:04:52 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

Sure, again, fair enough. I don't get spending so much time telling others they are wrong if you aren't trying to convince them that they are wrong, but fine.

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:07 PM. Reason : E]

My response when I read something wrong but have no desire to correct/convince them: "........"

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:08 PM. Reason : A]

^I'm jealous of lots of things for you! You're obviously smart and super well read!


[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:10 PM. Reason : Compliments for everyone ]

10/15/2026 11:07:37 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

in 2026, on a large/national scale, I don’t see anything worth debating

intra-party debates are different. I’m nearly certain that we’re on the same page when it comes to that. that’s way different than posting about the awfulness of the right on a regular basis. there is nothing up for debate when it comes to them.

10/15/2026 11:10:12 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

if anything i'm trying to convince others that their methods of evaluating reality are tainted. it's not about i'm right. it's that people are 100% convinced that the jew is a traitor

10/15/2026 11:10:38 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" it's that people are 100% convinced that the jew is a traitor"


and this is exactly why I was not a fan of the dumb horseshoe image comparing the two of us

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:14 PM. Reason : .]

10/15/2026 11:14:01 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

^^but, like, to want to convince you have to think they are wrong, and the end goal is to get them to look at reality "correct" and then they will agree with you bc you are objectively correct? I may be way off base but that sentence is the core of most of your posts by my interpretation.

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:16 PM. Reason : Yea i don't get why everything comes back to antisemitism, the boogie man in every closet ]

The whole point of the horseshoe is that opposing views end up having similarities, in this case: rwoody reading condescension



[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:18 PM. Reason : I wouldn't expect you to be a fan, it criticizes you ]

10/15/2026 11:14:45 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

to sum up my posts in TSB the most surface level possible: obviously bad things are bad

it is legitimately as simple as that. I don’t see how that’s in the same universe as whatever is going on with the other dude.

10/15/2026 11:21:01 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" Yea i don't get why everything comes back to antisemitism"


Quote :
"you wouldn't want to inadvertently do anything that creates more Totalitarianism extermination of Jews in the world, would you? perhaps then it would be wise to more closely study its Origins."


[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:27 PM. Reason : I don't like Totalitarianism. I am recognizing its Origins. Too many have already failed the test]

10/15/2026 11:26:21 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

^ok
^^ok

I relent we can go back to arguing making statements that have no underlying intent to change minds about Elon

10/15/2026 11:28:46 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

agreed

what'd y'all think of his neato flying car tonight. pretty neato right?

[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:30 PM. Reason : i like things that are neato]

10/15/2026 11:30:41 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
41236 Posts
user info
edit post

dude sucks shit

I do not care to see a wall of text that has absolutely nothing to do with dude sucking shit

10/15/2026 11:32:10 PM

qntmfred
retired
42796 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I am recognizing its Origins"


[Edited on October 15, 2026 at 11:34 PM. Reason : neato]

10/15/2026 11:34:11 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
40534 Posts
user info
edit post

10/15/2026 11:36:46 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » Elon Musk Credibility Watch Page 1 ... 23 24 25 26 [27], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2026 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.