seems to me if you're Pro-Something it means you're adamantly for somethingI definitely wouldn't say I'm Pro-Everything just cause I tolerate everybody...I just dont give a fuck what other people do...I think man-man sex is disgusting but I don't give a shit what people do in their own homes or whatever...I wouldn't say that makes me Pro-Gay...I'd say it makes me not give a shit
5/6/2008 12:40:53 PM
^^oh god, like that's going to be any differentHAYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:41 PM. Reason : .]
5/6/2008 12:40:59 PM
your homophobia is showingexample: racismI hate racial supremacists. Sure, you'll tell me that I am no better than them because I hate or something but I believe that their ideas are so undesirable we would be better off without them in our community. They should either leave or denounce their ideals.[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:43 PM. Reason : - contradiction is okay]
5/6/2008 12:41:37 PM
i just wish someone would make the fucking buses run on time
5/6/2008 12:41:53 PM
^^just trying to have a backbone ]
5/6/2008 12:41:56 PM
what if there are like 8 sluts and 2 dudes and for like 95% of the time it's full on dude on slut or slut on slut actionand then someone slips and it's a cock in the man buttdoes it ruin the rest of the filth?
5/6/2008 12:43:13 PM
5/6/2008 12:44:25 PM
haha was it consensual?more importantly, how did the people being penetrated feel about the experience?and most importantly, did Anyone feel coerced or uncomfortable?^ not a police state... a small community that is organized by affinity rather than geography[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM. Reason : -]
5/6/2008 12:44:26 PM
5/6/2008 12:44:30 PM
^^^^ Yes, because my boner goes away... [Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM. Reason : ^]
5/6/2008 12:44:44 PM
^x5 huh?[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM. Reason : damn I'm slow.....but it ruins ^ boner!]
5/6/2008 12:45:08 PM
5/6/2008 12:45:45 PM
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are not black supremacists in the way that David Duke is a white supremacist
5/6/2008 12:46:14 PM
5/6/2008 12:46:23 PM
^^ WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONGif anything, they're just better at it[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM. Reason : .]
5/6/2008 12:46:32 PM
I'll have to disagree with you on thatSharpton and Jackson are situated in culture differently than DukeSharpton and Jackson's subjective experiences of the world have been inflected by their position in culture resultant from race, class, gender, etc. As has Duke's.The three share a gender. Let's assume their class has been roughly the same with some variation considering that the three are public political figures and nobody in that game is particularly poor.So the difference here is race. In our culture blacks have been institutionally devalued. A degree of anger resulting from such an institutional oppression is to be expected. Duke, however, can only root his anger in class or gender. He is probably rich so his claims of class oppression don't stand. He's also male which is a privileged position. So Duke's claims of righteousness don't stand, in my opinion.[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM. Reason : -]
5/6/2008 12:52:44 PM
but you still think that they are black supremacists, you just think that they are justifiedthat doesn't fly in my book[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:54 PM. Reason : .]
5/6/2008 12:53:59 PM
5/6/2008 12:54:42 PM
I've never heard them call for the active oppression or extermination of other races which makes them okay in my bookand I can probably forgive most of their angry remarks because I think anger is justified in the case of black oppression in the United States^ yeah I recognized that in my statement - which is why race is the point on which Duke and Sharpton or Jackson differ[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM. Reason : -]
5/6/2008 12:55:45 PM
in the same vein that bush doesn't care about black peoplesharpton and jesse ONLY care about black people, that's why they make white people nervous (justifiably)this is why obama (and probably self imposed by sharpton and jesse) have kept them at a distanceand should probably keep doing so even if he wins the electionas divisive as they are, they are not good for his image or (in my opinion) the establishment of policy[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 12:59 PM. Reason : .]
5/6/2008 12:57:54 PM
^^how about Jeremiah Wright? he is clearly a black supremacist...do you view him in the same way as you do David Duke?(they're both pieces of shit btw)]
5/6/2008 12:58:00 PM
if he called for the oppression or extermination of any group yes I dobad people and they should be stopped
5/6/2008 12:59:19 PM
Snewf's white guilt is so strong that he cannot see the crazy or the intolerable
5/6/2008 1:00:29 PM
I can't see them? what?
5/6/2008 1:01:02 PM
you know what might help the situation?crunchy grooves
5/6/2008 1:01:08 PM
btw future employers, i'm not as racist irl as I appear on the interweb!
5/6/2008 1:02:27 PM
damn you're probably rightare you trying to parody me somehow?cause I'm not exactly like that in real lifewell shit, this was fun but I've gotta get to workI've got a bunch of nothing to do on campus for a while
5/6/2008 1:02:47 PM
try not to suck any dick on the way there
5/6/2008 1:03:12 PM
NO PMS NO VOTE
5/6/2008 9:47:25 PM